Showing posts with label college football. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college football. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

NCAA or Zoo - It's one answer only

Smart zoogoers know not to mess with even the oldest, sleepiest looking tiger, because they never fade away, and OSU knows not to mess with
39 Down - Fighting Tigers' sch.


218, 13

Sunday, September 2, 2007

Memo to Lloyd Carr - Chumps not Champs


Appalachian State Stuns Michigan -110,000 fans wept at the Big House in Ann Arbor yesterday. Lloyd Carr, the Michigan football coach had done everything right. His squad of blue chip Big Ten beef was ranked and ready. The victim, strike that, opponent, was a IAA patsy. Strike that - the NCAA just renamed IAA - which sounded like something from minor league baseball - with the even more humiliating moniker "subdivision". How could a suburban housing development be expected to compete with a Division IA power. No IAA squad had ever beaten a ranked IA team. The Wolverines would win, elate the fans and donating alumni, let the stars build some Heisman stats, give the second string a chance to play and do absolutely nothing to jeopardize their ranking. Lloyd made one small mistake, he scheduled the two time defending IAA champion Appalachian State Mountaineers.

The Mountaineers took a 28-14 lead in the second quarter, but Lloyd was still more grumpy than really worried. It would look shaky to the poll voters, but the cream still had time to rise. Michigan finally grabbed the lead with 4 and a half minutes left in the game. Appalachian State threw an interception on its next play. 110,000 fans exhaled simultaneously. The Mountaineers had finally remembered who they were, minor leaguers, victory was secure, and the Wolverines could recover in the polls - there was a lot of season left. Turns out there was a lot of game left and the Mountaineers remembered exactly who they were, champions who were not willing to go away with a fat check for scheduling Goliath and a moral victory. Maybe it was the fact that they had real playoff experience, the kind where you get to the championship by winning games instead of polls. Maybe they were just pissed off about playing in a "subdivision". Instead of folding the Mountaineers blocked two Michigan field goals and kicked their own to pull off one of the biggest upsets in college football history.

Lloyd - winners are winners. Don't take a chance on a champ when you need a chump, find a IA program that's always "rebuilding" for your opener.
p.s. Don't forget to work on special teams in the early practices next year - oh that's right - you won't be coaching next year. If you change your mind about retiring maybe one of the schools in the subdivision will have an opening for a veteran coach.
Special note to As Good As News Readers in Columbus - Congratulations, this must be better than winning a bowl game. Celebrate safely and do not look past the ever dangerous Zips.

Friday, August 24, 2007

Two Sporting Propositions




Bake Sales and Trash Pickup Help College Teams Stay Afloat -Penn State fencers, frequent NCAA champs, clean Beaver stadium after football games, even scraping the gum off the bottom of the seats. Some of the football players help out, the ones getting punished for fighting. Butler softball players get to clean the basketball arena. Utah swimmers have it easy, they cater the luxury boxes during the football games. Other "minor" sports sponsor bake sales and car washes. All these work projects and fundraisers fill budget gaps and keep the minor sports programs, which grant scholarships, alive. It may seem unfair, but consider the alternative. Just as Rutger's football turned the corner, swimming, crew and several other sports disappeared. Minor sports regularly vanish at the Division 1 schools. Title IX sometimes gets blamed, but the core problem is usually lack of funds, not the requirement that programs funded with state money provide for equal participation by women.

So - Nittany Lions - how about a sporting proposition. If the fencers finish higher than the football team in this year's NCAA rankings then the football team cleans its own stadium, turns the proceeds over to the fencers and participates in an exhibition fencing tournament as a fundraiser. All participants wear tights. If football ranks higher, the fencers clean again, and put on a skit as teenage mutant ninja turtles at the football awards dinner.

All this weirdness stems from the basic decision at most Division 1 (1 A in the case of men's football) schools to run football and basketball as a business. There are positive elements to this approach. A few successful programs consistently yield profits that help support other sports - although for many schools this is a mirage, encouraging futile investment to reach a goal that is always just out of reach. Even the programs that don't produce a steady income can win sometimes, boosting the spirits of students and alumni. Think about the Rutgers students spilling onto the field in a sea of red after last year's win over Louisville, and guess what it did for alumni donations and the number and quality of applications from incoming freshman.

As Good As News likes a good college ball game, but on balance running college sports as a business may do more harm than good. Some colleges, Williams for example, put enormous effort into recruiting, coaching and winning in a tremendous number of sports, but the goal is to develop the student (and maybe make the alumni a little happier), not fund the athletic department. MIT used to field teams in more sports than any other college, maybe it still does, but the goal was to compete hard at the level of the students , not recruit future pros.

How about one more wager, let's take a look at the income reported in the year 2018 by the members of the 2008 Williams football team and the 2008 University of Southern California Trojans, a preseason number one pick that will produce many professional athletes. First, As Good As News recognizes that income will not accurately measure the contribution, success or happiness of a teacher, musician, writer, curator, social worker, etc. Understood, but we need something we can count here. Now let's compare incomes in 2018 - the team with the higher income does nothing. Each member of the team with the lower income must donate 20% of his 2018 income to the athletic department of the winning school. Any takers gentlemen?